TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsIRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Security and Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(2 mappings)

AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment2 targets
→IRM-Process-Identification-Analysis-Evaluation-Treatment-Monitoring-Review-ISO31000-AlignedIRM Risk Management Process - 5-Stage Cycle + Identification + Analysis (Inherent/Residual) + Evaluation + Treatment (4Ts Tolerate/Treat/Transfer/Terminate) + Monitoring + Review + Communication + Risk Register
→IRM-RiskCategories-Strategic-Financial-Operational-Knowledge-FOIL-External-Internal-DownsideUpsideIRM Four Risk Categories - Strategic + Financial + Operational + Knowledge + FOIL Typology + External vs Internal + Downside Threats and Upside Opportunities + Risk Universe

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.016 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs SLSA11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs SIG (Shared Assessments)11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs PTES11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs OWASP SAMM11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs OWASP MASVS11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs OpenSSF Scorecard11 mappings

Other IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) comparisons

NIST Privacy Framework vs IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)2 mappingsVietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)2 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)2 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)2 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)2 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)2 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)2 mappingsPCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) vs IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 37 controls across its framework, while IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) covers 7 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Security and Operations, where 4 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

Of 37 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 1 map directly to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

36 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management). The highest concentration of gaps is in System Security and Operations with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Security and Operations (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.