Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsBelgium CyberFundamentals

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to Belgium CyberFundamentals. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to Belgium CyberFundamentals with 27% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(4 mappings)

AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment3 targets
BE-CF-13Risk assessment procedures
BE-CF-15Security categorization
BE-CF-17Continuous monitoring strategy
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege

Access Control and Identity Management(8 mappings)

AWWA-2.1User Access Management3 targets
BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning
BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege
BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
BE-CF-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
AWWA-2.3Account Management
BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls3 targets
BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning
BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege
BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification

Network and Communications Security(2 mappings)

AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
BE-CF-08Cryptographic protection of data
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
BE-CF-08Cryptographic protection of data

System Security and Operations(6 mappings)

AWWA-4.3Configuration Management3 targets
BE-CF-23Baseline configuration establishment
BE-CF-25Security impact analysis
BE-CF-26System component inventory
AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring3 targets
BE-CF-28Audit event logging and storage
BE-CF-29Audit record review and analysis
BE-CF-31Audit log protection and retention

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

Other Belgium CyberFundamentals comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 701 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and Belgium CyberFundamentals?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 37 controls across its framework, while Belgium CyberFundamentals covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Monitoring, where 2 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct Belgium CyberFundamentals equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and Belgium CyberFundamentals?

Of 37 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 10 map directly to Belgium CyberFundamentals controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to Belgium CyberFundamentals?

27 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in Belgium CyberFundamentals. The highest concentration of gaps is in Monitoring with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and Belgium CyberFundamentals?

The domain with the highest gap count is Monitoring (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.