TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)vsBelgium CyberFundamentals

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls map to Belgium CyberFundamentals. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

40
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
59%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) maps to Belgium CyberFundamentals with 59% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Configuration and Identification Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Access Control Assessment(13 mappings)

171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement3 targets
→BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning
→BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege
→BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification
171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties3 targets
→BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning
→BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege
→BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification
171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege
→BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls4 targets
→BE-CF-01Account management and provisioning
→BE-CF-02Access enforcement and least privilege
→BE-CF-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
→BE-CF-06Identity proofing and verification
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls2 targets
→BE-CF-03Multi-factor authentication requirements
→BE-CF-08Cryptographic protection of data

Awareness and Training / Audit Assessment(7 mappings)

171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting3 targets
→BE-CF-28Audit event logging and storage
→BE-CF-29Audit record review and analysis
→BE-CF-31Audit log protection and retention
171A-AU-03Assess Audit Record Protection3 targets
→BE-CF-28Audit event logging and storage
→BE-CF-29Audit record review and analysis
→BE-CF-31Audit log protection and retention
171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention
→BE-CF-28Audit event logging and storage

+20 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs NIST Privacy Framework21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.020 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs SLSA19 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs SIG (Shared Assessments)19 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs PTES19 mappings

Other Belgium CyberFundamentals comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals44 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Belgium CyberFundamentals18 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs Belgium CyberFundamentals18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs Belgium CyberFundamentals14 mappingsAPI 1164 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals13 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Belgium CyberFundamentals13 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals11 mappingsAPPI vs Belgium CyberFundamentals10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and Belgium CyberFundamentals?

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) has 32 controls across its framework, while Belgium CyberFundamentals covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (59% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Configuration and Identification Assessment, where 3 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls have no direct Belgium CyberFundamentals equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and Belgium CyberFundamentals?

Of 32 total NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls, 19 map directly to Belgium CyberFundamentals controls — representing 59% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) to Belgium CyberFundamentals?

13 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls have no direct equivalent in Belgium CyberFundamentals. The highest concentration of gaps is in Configuration and Identification Assessment with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and Belgium CyberFundamentals?

The domain with the highest gap count is Configuration and Identification Assessment (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.