TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) with 28% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
→EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification
→EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical Security

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.7.4Response and Recovery Plans
→EBA-GL-3.7.5Testing of Plans

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→EBA-GL-3.4.5Security Monitoring
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management
→EBA-GL-3.4.6Information Security Reviews and Testing
AWS-WA-24Cloud change management
→EBA-GL-3.6.3ICT Change Management

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)19 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)19 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)18 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)18 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)18 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)17 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 7 map directly to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

18 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.