TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsISO 27018

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to ISO 27018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
55
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to ISO 27018 with 21% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 70 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity & Access Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cloud Security Overview(9 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→ISO27018-01Shared responsibility model definition
AWS-WA-02Cloud security policy and strategy3 targets
→ISO27018-02Cloud security policy and strategy
→ISO27018-05Cloud security roles and responsibilities
→ISO27018-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
→ISO27018-03Cloud risk assessment
AWS-WA-04Regulatory compliance for cloud services
→ISO27018-04Regulatory compliance for cloud services
AWS-WA-05Cloud security roles and responsibilities3 targets
→ISO27018-02Cloud security policy and strategy
→ISO27018-05Cloud security roles and responsibilities
→ISO27018-21Cloud security monitoring and logging

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management
→ISO27018-06Cloud identity management
AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→ISO27018-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→ISO27018-08Privileged access in cloud environments

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(8 mappings)

AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud
→ISO27018-11Data classification for cloud
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data4 targets
→ISO27018-11Data classification for cloud
→ISO27018-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→ISO27018-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→ISO27018-15Secure data deletion in cloud
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud3 targets
→ISO27018-11Data classification for cloud
→ISO27018-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→ISO27018-15Secure data deletion in cloud

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14619 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14419 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISMAP (Japan)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappings

Other ISO 27018 comparisons

NIST SP 800-146 vs ISO 2701819 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs ISO 2701819 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs ISO 2701819 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs ISO 2701819 mappingsISO 27017 vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO 2701819 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs ISO 2701819 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs ISO 2701815 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and ISO 27018?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 89 controls across its framework, while ISO 27018 covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity & Access Management, where 15 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct ISO 27018 equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and ISO 27018?

Of 89 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 19 map directly to ISO 27018 controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 70 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to ISO 27018?

70 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity & Access Management with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and ISO 27018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity & Access Management (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.