TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) with 45% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

FTC Safeguards Rule: 9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Encryption, MFA, Disposal, Change, Monitoring, Pen Test (314.4(c))(3 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))3 targets
→FDBR-ControllerObligations-DPA-NoticeController + Processor Obligations + Data Protection Assessments (Fla. Stat. 501.707, 501.708, 501.71, 501.711)
→FDBR-Scope-DefsScope, Applicability Thresholds and Definitions (Fla. Stat. 501.701, 501.702, 501.703, 501.704)
→FDBR-SensitiveData-Children-VoiceFacialSensitive Data, Children's Privacy and Voice/Facial Recognition (Fla. Stat. 501.711, 501.1735)

FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination)(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→FDBR-Scope-DefsScope, Applicability Thresholds and Definitions (Fla. Stat. 501.701, 501.702, 501.703, 501.704)

FTC Safeguards Rule: Comprehensive Information Security Program and Qualified Individual (314.3, 314.4(a))(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-Program-Qualified-IndividualComprehensive Information Security Program + Qualified Individual (16 CFR 314.3, 314.4(a))
→FDBR-Scope-DefsScope, Applicability Thresholds and Definitions (Fla. Stat. 501.701, 501.702, 501.703, 501.704)

FTC Safeguards Rule: Scope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)(2 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)2 targets
→FDBR-ControllerObligations-DPA-NoticeController + Processor Obligations + Data Protection Assessments (Fla. Stat. 501.707, 501.708, 501.71, 501.711)
→FDBR-Scope-DefsScope, Applicability Thresholds and Definitions (Fla. Stat. 501.701, 501.702, 501.703, 501.704)

FTC Safeguards Rule: Service Provider Oversight and Program Evaluation (314.4(d-g))(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))
→FDBR-Enforcement-AG-CurePeriodEnforcement by Florida Department of Legal Affairs + Penalties + 45-Day Cure (Fla. Stat. 501.72, 501.721, 501.722)

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs India DPDP Act6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 20226 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Switzerland FADP6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Barbados Data Protection Act 20196 mappings

Other Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) comparisons

NIST SP 800-146 vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)4 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)4 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)4 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)4 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)4 mappingsISO 13485 vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)4 mappingsWisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)4 mappingsTennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 701 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 11 controls across its framework, while Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination), where 4 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)?

Of 11 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 5 map directly to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)?

6 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR). The highest concentration of gaps is in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.