Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsIEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes with 18% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Asset, Change, and Configuration Management(4 mappings)

AESCSF-ACM-2Configuration Management2 targets
IEC62304-4.1Quality Management System
IEC62304-5.1Software Development Planning
AESCSF-ACM-3Change Management2 targets
IEC62304-8.2Change Control
IEC62304-9.4Use Change Control Process

Supply Chain and Dependencies(3 mappings)

AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
IEC62304-4.1Quality Management System
IEC62304-5.1Software Development Planning
IEC62304-7.4Risk Management of Software Changes

Threat and Vulnerability Management(3 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence3 targets
IEC62304-4.1Quality Management System
IEC62304-5.1Software Development Planning
IEC62304-7.4Risk Management of Software Changes

Risk Management(9 mappings)

FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management3 targets
IEC62304-4.1Quality Management System
IEC62304-5.1Software Development Planning
IEC62304-7.4Risk Management of Software Changes
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
IEC62304-4.1Quality Management System
IEC62304-5.1Software Development Planning
IEC62304-7.4Risk Management of Software Changes
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach3 targets
IEC62304-4.1Quality Management System
IEC62304-5.1Software Development Planning
IEC62304-7.4Risk Management of Software Changes

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Other IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 39 controls across its framework, while IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 13 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

Of 39 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 7 map directly to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

32 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.