TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
46%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 46% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Asset, Change, and Configuration Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-ACM-2Configuration Management
→CRAF-3.3Infrastructure Security

Identity and Access Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-IAM-2Access Control
→CRAF-3.1Access Control

Event and Incident Response(6 mappings)

AESCSF-IR-1Incident Response Plan2 targets
→CRAF-5.1Incident Response Planning
→CRAF-5.2Incident Response Execution
AESCSF-IR-2Incident Response Capability2 targets
→CRAF-5.1Incident Response Planning
→CRAF-5.2Incident Response Execution
AESCSF-IR-3Incident Reporting2 targets
→CRAF-5.1Incident Response Planning
→CRAF-5.2Incident Response Execution

Situational Awareness and Event Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-SA-2Anomaly Detection
→CRAF-4.4Anomaly Detection

Supply Chain and Dependencies(3 mappings)

AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→CRAF-1.1Cyber Risk Governance
→CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy
→CRAF-3.6Third-Party Risk Management

Threat and Vulnerability Management(8 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
→CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence5 targets
→CRAF-1.1Cyber Risk Governance
→CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy
→CRAF-3.6Third-Party Risk Management
→CRAF-4.2Threat Intelligence
→CRAF-6.1Cyber Threat Landscape Monitoring
CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
→CRAF-4.3Security Testing
CSA-TVM-02Penetration Testing
→CRAF-4.3Security Testing

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs CSA CCM v424 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)22 mappings

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)15 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)15 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 39 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 10 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

Of 39 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 18 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

21 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.