Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)vsIATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls map to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) maps to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production with 14% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Consent and Authorization(3 mappings)

CDR-3Consent Withdrawal3 targets
IATF-4.4Quality Management System and Its Processes
IATF-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities and Authorities
IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities

Compliance and Enforcement(13 mappings)

EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme2 targets
IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
IATF-8.1Operational Planning and Control
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM3 targets
IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
IATF-8.1Operational Planning and Control
IATF-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products and Services
EUDR-CE-03Penalties
IATF-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products and Services
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements2 targets
IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
IATF-8.1Operational Planning and Control
PSTI-CMP-03Enforcement and Penalties3 targets
IATF-4.4Quality Management System and Its Processes
IATF-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities and Authorities
IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting2 targets
IATF-10.3Continual Improvement
IATF-9.2Internal Audit

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Other IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) has 50 controls across its framework, while IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 32 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

Of 50 total Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls, 7 map directly to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

43 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production. The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 32 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (32 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.