TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsIATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production

See exactly how AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
46
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System maps to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production with 8% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 65 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(7 mappings)

8.3Statement of Applicability linkage3 targets
→IATF16949-Clause4-Context-Scope-CustomerSpecific-ProductSafetyIATF 16949 Clause 4 - Context of Organization + QMS Scope + Customer Specific Requirements + Product Safety
→IATF16949-Clause5-Leadership-Corporate-QualityPolicy-RolesIATF 16949 Clause 5 - Leadership + Top Management Commitment + Corporate Responsibility + Quality Policy + Roles
→IATF16949-Clause6-Planning-Risk-Contingency-Objectives-ChangeIATF 16949 Clause 6 - Planning + Risks and Opportunities + Contingency Plans + Quality Objectives + Change
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
→IATF16949-Clause8-Supplier-QMS-Development-Externally-ProvidedIATF 16949 Clause 8 Supplier - Control of Externally Provided Processes + Type and Extent + Supplier QMS Development
AS9100D-8.5Production and Service Provision3 targets
→IATF16949-Clause4-Context-Scope-CustomerSpecific-ProductSafetyIATF 16949 Clause 4 - Context of Organization + QMS Scope + Customer Specific Requirements + Product Safety
→IATF16949-Clause5-Leadership-Corporate-QualityPolicy-RolesIATF 16949 Clause 5 - Leadership + Top Management Commitment + Corporate Responsibility + Quality Policy + Roles
→IATF16949-Clause6-Planning-Risk-Contingency-Objectives-ChangeIATF 16949 Clause 6 - Planning + Risks and Opportunities + Contingency Plans + Quality Objectives + Change

Improvement(2 mappings)

AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action2 targets
→IATF16949-Clause10-Improvement-Nonconformity-CorrectiveAction-Problem-ErrorProofIATF 16949 Clause 10 - Improvement + Nonconformity + Corrective Action + Problem Solving + Error Proofing + Continual Improvement
→IATF16949-Clause4-Context-Scope-CustomerSpecific-ProductSafetyIATF 16949 Clause 4 - Context of Organization + QMS Scope + Customer Specific Requirements + Product Safety

Improvement (Clause 10)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action2 targets
→IATF16949-Clause10-Improvement-Nonconformity-CorrectiveAction-Problem-ErrorProofIATF 16949 Clause 10 - Improvement + Nonconformity + Corrective Action + Problem Solving + Error Proofing + Continual Improvement
→IATF16949-Clause4-Context-Scope-CustomerSpecific-ProductSafetyIATF 16949 Clause 4 - Context of Organization + QMS Scope + Customer Specific Requirements + Product Safety

Leadership (Clause 5)(3 mappings)

AS9100D-5.1Leadership and Commitment3 targets
→IATF16949-Clause4-Context-Scope-CustomerSpecific-ProductSafetyIATF 16949 Clause 4 - Context of Organization + QMS Scope + Customer Specific Requirements + Product Safety
→IATF16949-Clause5-Leadership-Corporate-QualityPolicy-RolesIATF 16949 Clause 5 - Leadership + Top Management Commitment + Corporate Responsibility + Quality Policy + Roles
→IATF16949-Clause6-Planning-Risk-Contingency-Objectives-ChangeIATF 16949 Clause 6 - Planning + Risks and Opportunities + Contingency Plans + Quality Objectives + Change

Operation(1 mappings)

AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
→IATF16949-Clause8-Supplier-QMS-Development-Externally-ProvidedIATF 16949 Clause 8 Supplier - Control of Externally Provided Processes + Type and Extent + Supplier QMS Development

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 9001:201538 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO/IEC 42001:202327 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 22000:201826 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 27701:201926 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 45001:201824 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 22301:201924 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 37301:202124 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 37001:201623 mappings

Other IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons

USMCA Chapter 19 - Digital Trade (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) vs IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production6 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production6 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production5 mappingsISO/IEC 27014:2020 vs IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production5 mappingsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) vs IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production5 mappingsAnnex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems vs IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production5 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production5 mappingsFrench Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) vs IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System has 61 controls across its framework, while IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 11 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

Of 61 total AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 7 map directly to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 65 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

65 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.