Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC Health Breach Notification RulevsIATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production

See exactly how FTC Health Breach Notification Rule controls map to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC Health Breach Notification Rule maps to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production with 16% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 FTC Health Breach Notification Rule controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Scope and Definitions(4 mappings)

64.2003Definitions2 targets
IATF-10.3Continual Improvement
IATF-9.2Internal Audit
Art. 2Consent Definition2 targets
IATF-10.3Continual Improvement
IATF-9.2Internal Audit

Compliance and Enforcement(13 mappings)

EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme2 targets
IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
IATF-8.1Operational Planning and Control
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM3 targets
IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
IATF-8.1Operational Planning and Control
IATF-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products and Services
EUDR-CE-03Penalties
IATF-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products and Services
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements2 targets
IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
IATF-8.1Operational Planning and Control
PSTI-CMP-03Enforcement and Penalties3 targets
IATF-4.4Quality Management System and Its Processes
IATF-5.3Organizational Roles, Responsibilities and Authorities
IATF-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting2 targets
IATF-10.3Continual Improvement
IATF-9.2Internal Audit

Related Comparisons

Other FTC Health Breach Notification Rule comparisons

Other IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FTC Health Breach Notification Rule and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

FTC Health Breach Notification Rule has 50 controls across its framework, while IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 32 FTC Health Breach Notification Rule controls have no direct IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC Health Breach Notification Rule and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

Of 50 total FTC Health Breach Notification Rule controls, 8 map directly to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC Health Breach Notification Rule to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

42 FTC Health Breach Notification Rule controls have no direct equivalent in IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production. The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 32 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC Health Breach Notification Rule and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (32 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.