TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)vsACSC Essential Eight

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls map to ACSC Essential Eight. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) maps to ACSC Essential Eight with 11% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Information Security (Schedule 2)(5 mappings)

AUCDR-IS-1Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment2 targets
→E8-ADMIN-ML1Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML1)
→E8-MFA-ML1Multi-Factor Authentication - Maturity Level 1
AUCDR-IS-4Formal vulnerability management program2 targets
→E8-PATCHAPP-ML1Patch Applications (ML1)
→E8-PATCHOS-ML1Patch Operating Systems (ML1)
AUCDR-IS-5Limit, prevent, detect and remove malware
→E8-APP-ML1Application Control (ML1)

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs APRA CPS 2347 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs GDPR7 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 56 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.06 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020)4 mappings

Other ACSC Essential Eight comparisons

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ACSC Essential Eight24 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ACSC Essential Eight24 mappingsAustralian Information Security Manual vs ACSC Essential Eight15 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ACSC Essential Eight15 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs ACSC Essential Eight15 mappingsSWIFT CSCF vs ACSC Essential Eight9 mappingsDefence Industry Security Program (DISP) vs ACSC Essential Eight8 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs ACSC Essential Eight8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and ACSC Essential Eight?

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) has 28 controls across its framework, while ACSC Essential Eight covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy Safeguards, where 13 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls have no direct ACSC Essential Eight equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and ACSC Essential Eight?

Of 28 total Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls, 3 map directly to ACSC Essential Eight controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) to ACSC Essential Eight?

25 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in ACSC Essential Eight. The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy Safeguards with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and ACSC Essential Eight?

The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy Safeguards (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.