Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience StandardvsIATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
38
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard maps to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production with 5% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Check.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Policy and Planning(2 mappings)

4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis2 targets
IATF16949-Clause6-Planning-Risk-Contingency-Objectives-ChangeIATF 16949 Clause 6 - Planning + Risks and Opportunities + Contingency Plans + Quality Objectives + Change
IATF16949-Clause8-Operation-APQP-Design-Production-ControlPlan-SpecialCharsIATF 16949 Clause 8 - Operation Planning + APQP + Design + Special Characteristics + Production + Control Plan + Set-Up Verification

Implementation and Operation(2 mappings)

4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority2 targets
IATF16949-Clause10-Improvement-Nonconformity-CorrectiveAction-Problem-ErrorProofIATF 16949 Clause 10 - Improvement + Nonconformity + Corrective Action + Problem Solving + Error Proofing + Continual Improvement
IATF16949-Clause9-Performance-Monitoring-InternalAudit-ManagementReviewIATF 16949 Clause 9 - Performance Evaluation + Monitoring + Internal Audit + Manufacturing Process Audit + Management Review

Related Comparisons

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

Other IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard has 42 controls across its framework, while IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Check, where 6 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

Of 42 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 2 map directly to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

40 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production. The highest concentration of gaps is in Check with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?

The domain with the highest gap count is Check (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.