Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience StandardvsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard maps to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards with 5% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Checking and Corrective Action.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Policy and Planning(1 mappings)

4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis
P1-S1Advance Electronic Information

Related Comparisons

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

Other Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard has 22 controls across its framework, while Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Checking and Corrective Action, where 5 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards?

Of 22 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 1 map directly to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards?

21 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards. The highest concentration of gaps is in Checking and Corrective Action with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards?

The domain with the highest gap count is Checking and Corrective Action (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.