TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
88
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards with 9% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 96 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

GV - Govern(9 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→P1-S2Risk management
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→P1-S2Risk management
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→P1-S1Advance electronic information
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established5 targets
→AEO-11Risk management and threat assessment
→AEO-2Customs compliance record
→AEO-4Financial solvency
→P1-S2Risk management
→P2-S1Partnership programme (AEO)
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-04Suppliers are known and prioritized by criticality
→AEO-7Business partner security

ID - Identify(7 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained3 targets
→AEO-2Customs compliance record
→AEO-4Financial solvency
→P2-S1Partnership programme (AEO)
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
→P1-S1Advance electronic information
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk3 targets
→AEO-2Customs compliance record
→AEO-4Financial solvency
→P2-S1Partnership programme (AEO)

PR - Protect(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
→P2-S3Authorization and validation
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
→AEO-9Information security and IT systems

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards7 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards7 mappingsISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards6 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards6 mappingsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards5 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards5 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards5 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 23 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 10 map directly to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 96 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards?

96 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 23 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (23 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.