Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good PracticesvsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)

See exactly how ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 23% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Detect and Respond.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Identify and Protect(5 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-ID-2Access Control5 targets
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
BIPA-SEC5-2Biometric Information Definition
NAIC-668-3Definitions
NAIC-668-4D1Access Controls
NAIC-ISP-03Security Measures

Resilience and Recovery(2 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-RES-2Recovery Testing2 targets
NAIC-668-5BInvestigation Scope
NAIC-TPM-02Cybersecurity Event Investigation

Detect and Respond(11 mappings)

SWIFT-DET-01Logging and Monitoring
NAIC-668-4D5Audit Trails
SWIFT-DET-02Malware Protection5 targets
7012(a)Definitions
Art. 17Governance Structure
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
CTDPA-1Definitions
DMF-1.2Roles and Responsibilities
SWIFT-DET-04Cyber Incident Response5 targets
7012(a)Definitions
Art. 17Governance Structure
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
CTDPA-1Definitions
DMF-1.2Roles and Responsibilities

Related Comparisons

Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 22 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Detect and Respond, where 5 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Of 22 total ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls, 5 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

17 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Detect and Respond with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Detect and Respond (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.