Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)vsISO 22320:2018

See exactly how ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls map to ISO 22320:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
123
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) maps to ISO 22320:2018 with 5% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 136 ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls identifies 129 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Personnel Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 136 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Cyber Security Principles and Governance(4 mappings)

ISM-1211Incident Response Plan3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
ISM-1567Cyber Supply Chain Risk Management
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

System Monitoring and Event Logging(3 mappings)

ISM-1228Timely Event Analysis3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples

Backup and Recovery(2 mappings)

ISM-1705Backup Access Restriction
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISM-1811Resilient Backup Storage
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process

Personnel Security(1 mappings)

PSPF-PERS-4Separation and Transfer
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process

Network Security(3 mappings)

UK-TSA-NET-01Security Architecture3 targets
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) and ISO 22320:2018?

ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) has 136 controls across its framework, while ISO 22320:2018 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personnel Security, where 22 ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls have no direct ISO 22320:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) and ISO 22320:2018?

Of 136 total ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls, 7 map directly to ISO 22320:2018 controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 129 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) to ISO 22320:2018?

129 ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22320:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Personnel Security with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) and ISO 22320:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Personnel Security (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.