TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsProposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)

See exactly how AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
47
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System maps to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) with 7% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 53 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
→Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
→Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(7 mappings)

ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS7 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 8Data Categories
→Art.2Definitions
→Art.8Prohibited Acts

Planning (Clause 6)(1 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
→Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence16 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO/IEC 27003:201716 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products16 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food15 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements14 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence13 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production12 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange11 mappings

Other Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) comparisons

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)17 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingseIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System has 57 controls across its framework, while Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 12 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

Of 57 total AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 4 map directly to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 53 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

53 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491). The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.