TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)vsProposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls map to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) maps to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) with 16% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Consent and Authorization(13 mappings)

CDR-1Consumer Consent Framework4 targets
→Art. 10Consent Requirements
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 7Minimum Standards
→Art. 9Free Data Sharing
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal9 targets
→Art. 10Consent Requirements
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 19Consent Management Controls
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 7Minimum Standards
→Art. 8Data Categories
→Art. 9Free Data Sharing
→HUN-2Definitions
→HUN-3Fundamental Rules

Privacy and Security Safeguards(5 mappings)

CDR-11Data Minimization5 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 19Consent Management Controls
→Art. 8Data Categories
→HUN-2Definitions
→HUN-3Fundamental Rules

Data Holder Obligations(1 mappings)

CDR-6IT and Security Requirements
→URY-1Fundamental Right (Article 1)

Compliance and Enforcement(1 mappings)

EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
→Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs EU Digital Markets Act18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs FTC Health Breach Notification Rule18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) comparisons

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)17 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)16 mappingseIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)15 mappingsJapan Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (ASCT) — Digital Services vs Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) has 50 controls across its framework, while Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 34 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

Of 50 total Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls, 8 map directly to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) to Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

42 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491). The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM(2023) 491)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.