TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers with 16% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Leadership (Clause 5).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9–10)(1 mappings)

9.1N32 Interface Security (PRINS/TLS)
→B.2Data Protection and Encryption

Operation (Clause 8)(11 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control2 targets
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
→B.4Secure Configuration
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services3 targets
→A.1Governance Framework
→A.3Asset Management
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control3 targets
→A.1Governance Framework
→A.3Asset Management
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment2 targets
→A.2Risk Assessment
→CRP-1Cyber Risk Profile Assessment
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System16 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs ISO/IEC 27003:201716 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products15 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements14 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food14 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)13 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202113 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts13 mappings

Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers16 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Leadership (Clause 5), where 10 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 6 map directly to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

32 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. The highest concentration of gaps is in Leadership (Clause 5) with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

The domain with the highest gap count is Leadership (Clause 5) (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.