TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for ExchangesvsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers

See exactly how MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls map to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

36
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
57%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges maps to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers with 57% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 36 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Controls(20 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue4 targets
→B.1Access Control
→B.4Secure Configuration
→D.1Incident Response Planning
→D.2Incident Reporting
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management4 targets
→A.2Risk Assessment
→CRP-1Cyber Risk Profile Assessment
→D.1Incident Response Planning
→D.2Incident Reporting
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
→B.3Network Security
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection3 targets
→B.1Access Control
→B.2Data Protection and Encryption
→C.2Security Event Logging
NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management
→B.4Secure Configuration
NRC73-CTL-05Supply Chain Security for CDAs3 targets
→A.1Governance Framework
→A.3Asset Management
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management4 targets
→A.2Risk Assessment
→A.4Supply Chain Risk Management
→A.5Security Training and Awareness
→CRP-1Cyber Risk Profile Assessment

+16 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges comparisons

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs CSA CCM v415 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs FedRAMP Rev 515 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments14 mappings

Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers16 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges has 21 controls across its framework, while UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (57% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 9 MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls have no direct UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers equivalent.

How many controls map between MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

Of 21 total MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls, 12 map directly to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls — representing 57% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

9 MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls have no direct equivalent in UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.