Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsNIST SP 800-39

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to NIST SP 800-39. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to NIST SP 800-39 with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9–10)(1 mappings)

10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
NIST39-19Continuous improvement of risk processes

Operation (Clause 8)(9 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control3 targets
NIST39-11Risk treatment options and selection
NIST39-14Risk transfer and insurance
NIST39-18Risk register maintenance
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment3 targets
NIST39-06Risk identification methods
NIST39-09Risk scenario development
NIST39-10Risk interdependency analysis
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment3 targets
NIST39-11Risk treatment options and selection
NIST39-14Risk transfer and insurance
NIST39-18Risk register maintenance

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-39 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and NIST SP 800-39?

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-39 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 11 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct NIST SP 800-39 equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and NIST SP 800-39?

Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-39 controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to NIST SP 800-39?

34 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-39. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and NIST SP 800-39?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.