Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software with 5% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9–10)(3 mappings)

9.2Network Domain Security3 targets
ECSS-5.2.1System Requirements Analysis
ECSS-5.3.3Review Milestones
ECSS-E-40C-5.4.1Software Requirements

Operation (Clause 8)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control2 targets
ECSS-5.3.2Software Configuration Management
ECSS-E-40C-5.3.2Configuration Management

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Other ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software?

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 13 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software?

Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 2 map directly to ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software?

36 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.