TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software with 14% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(3 mappings)

3.3Record Completion and Maintenance3 targets
→ECSS-5.2.1System Requirements Analysis
→ECSS-5.3.3Review Milestones
→ECSS-E-40C-5.4.1Software Requirements

System Protection and Communications(10 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy2 targets
→ECSS-5.3.2Software Configuration Management
→ECSS-E-40C-5.3.2Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration2 targets
→ECSS-5.3.2Software Configuration Management
→ECSS-E-40C-5.3.2Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings3 targets
→ECSS-5.2.1System Requirements Analysis
→ECSS-5.3.3Review Milestones
→ECSS-E-40C-5.4.1Software Requirements
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup3 targets
→ECSS-5.2.1System Requirements Analysis
→ECSS-5.3.3Review Milestones
→ECSS-E-40C-5.4.1Software Requirements

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software5 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software5 mappingsC5 (Germany) vs ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software5 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software5 mappingsECSS Software Engineering Standards vs ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software5 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software5 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software5 mappingsDORA vs ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 11 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 5 map directly to ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software?

30 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ECSS-E-ST-40C: Space Engineering — Software?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.