TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
29
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards with 13% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Leadership (Clause 5).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(9 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
→P1-S2Risk Management
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services3 targets
→AEO-2Financial Viability
→AEO-4Supply Chain Security
→P2-S1Partnership Programme
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control3 targets
→AEO-2Financial Viability
→AEO-4Supply Chain Security
→P2-S1Partnership Programme
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
→P1-S1Advance Electronic Information
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
→P1-S2Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System16 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs ISO/IEC 27003:201716 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products15 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements14 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food14 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)13 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202113 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts13 mappings

Other Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards comparisons

WCO Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Framework vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards8 mappingsWCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards8 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards8 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards7 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards7 mappingsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards7 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards7 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards?

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Leadership (Clause 5), where 10 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards?

Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 5 map directly to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards?

33 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards. The highest concentration of gaps is in Leadership (Clause 5) with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards?

The domain with the highest gap count is Leadership (Clause 5) (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.