APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions
See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions with 6% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 52 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Service Provider Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Governance(1 mappings)
Operational Risk Management Framework(1 mappings)
Critical Operations(1 mappings)
Business Continuity(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons
Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 47 controls across its framework, while Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Service Provider Management, where 12 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions equivalent.
How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
Of 47 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 4 map directly to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 52 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
52 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. The highest concentration of gaps is in Service Provider Management with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
The domain with the highest gap count is Service Provider Management (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.