Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions with 26% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Service Provider Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(8 mappings)

CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
CPS230-13Incident Management2 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework

Critical Operations(2 mappings)

CPS230-22Vulnerability and Gap Identification2 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-03Cybersecurity Testing
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework

Business Continuity(4 mappings)

CPS230-25Business Continuity Policy
RBI-CYB-GOV-03Cyber Crisis Management Plan
CPS230-26Business Continuity Plans
RBI-CYB-GOV-03Cyber Crisis Management Plan
CPS230-27BCP Scope
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
CPS230-28Recovery Objectives
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery

Service Provider Management(6 mappings)

CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls across its framework, while Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Service Provider Management, where 10 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

Of 43 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 11 map directly to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

32 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. The highest concentration of gaps is in Service Provider Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

The domain with the highest gap count is Service Provider Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.