TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
41
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) with 11% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 51 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Business Continuity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 447K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 447K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(2 mappings)

CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment
→IMO-CY-1.2Cyber Risk Assessment
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities

Business Continuity(2 mappings)

CPS230-28Recovery Objectives2 targets
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
→IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning

Service Provider Management(2 mappings)

CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 526 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs South Korea ISMS-P11 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation11 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions11 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)11 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments10 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)10 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges10 mappings

Other IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)8 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 725 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (447K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 47 controls across its framework, while IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Business Continuity, where 11 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

Of 47 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 5 map directly to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 51 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

51 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). The highest concentration of gaps is in Business Continuity with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Business Continuity (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.