APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsIATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production
See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production with 6% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 52 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Business Continuity.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Operational Risk Management Framework(2 mappings)
Operations(1 mappings)
Business Continuity(1 mappings)
Service Provider Management(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons
Other IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 47 controls across its framework, while IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Business Continuity, where 11 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production equivalent.
How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
Of 47 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 4 map directly to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 52 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
52 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production. The highest concentration of gaps is in Business Continuity with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
The domain with the highest gap count is Business Continuity (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.