Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsCDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
29
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) with 14% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Business Continuity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(6 mappings)

CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment3 targets
CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review3 targets
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach

Business Continuity(1 mappings)

CPS230-27BCP Scope
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management

Service Provider Management(7 mappings)

CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy3 targets
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management3 targets
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
CPS230-49Internal Audit of Service Providers
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

Other CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls across its framework, while CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Business Continuity, where 11 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)?

Of 43 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 6 map directly to CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)?

37 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project). The highest concentration of gaps is in Business Continuity with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Business Continuity (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.