Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 220 Risk ManagementvsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)

See exactly how APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls map to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management maps to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Governance and Oversight(4 mappings)

CPS220-GOV-3Three Lines of Defence2 targets
EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework
EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management
CPS220-GOV-4Risk Management Declaration2 targets
EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework
EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management

Risk Assessment and Reporting(4 mappings)

CPS220-RAR-1Material Risk Identification2 targets
EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification
EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment
CPS220-RAR-4Risk Reporting2 targets
EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework
EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 220 Risk Management comparisons

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management has 8 controls across its framework, while EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment and Reporting, where 2 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls have no direct EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

Of 8 total APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls, 4 map directly to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 220 Risk Management to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

4 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment and Reporting with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment and Reporting (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.