Cross-Framework Mapping

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)vsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)

See exactly how AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls map to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) maps to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Reporting Obligations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AML/CTF Program Requirements(3 mappings)

AMLCTF-82Part A Compliance
LkSG-4.1Risk Management System Establishment
AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssessML/TF Risk Assessment2 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.2Preventive Measures for Own Business

Reporting Obligations(11 mappings)

MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation5 targets
LkSG-10.1Annual Reporting
LkSG-10.2Public Disclosure
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.1Policy Statement
LkSG-9.1Complaints Procedure
MSA-14Joint Statements3 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.1Policy Statement
LkSG-9.1Complaints Procedure
MSA-15Voluntary Statements3 targets
LkSG-4.3Risk Analysis (Section 5)
LkSG-6.1Policy Statement
LkSG-9.1Complaints Procedure

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) has 41 controls across its framework, while German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Reporting Obligations, where 14 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) equivalent.

How many controls map between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

Of 41 total AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls, 5 map directly to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

36 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). The highest concentration of gaps is in Reporting Obligations with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Reporting Obligations (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.