TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP SecurityvsUS NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants

See exactly how 3GPP Security controls map to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security maps to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants with 10% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 3GPP Security controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3GPP Security: Communications Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3GPP Security: Information Security Policies(3 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-04Roles and responsibilities definition3 targets
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management

3GPP Security: Access Control(1 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-14Privileged access management
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training

3GPP Security: Operations Security(1 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-23Backup and recovery procedures
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security comparisons

3GPP Security vs NIST SP 800-18316 mappings3GPP Security vs MITRE ATT&CK16 mappings3GPP Security vs OWASP SAMM16 mappings3GPP Security vs OWASP ASVS16 mappings3GPP Security vs PTES16 mappings3GPP Security vs NIST SP 800-13716 mappings3GPP Security vs NIST SP 800-15016 mappings3GPP Security vs OWASP MASVS16 mappings

Other US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

3GPP Security has 31 controls across its framework, while US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3GPP Security: Communications Security, where 5 3GPP Security controls have no direct US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

Of 31 total 3GPP Security controls, 3 map directly to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

28 3GPP Security controls have no direct equivalent in US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. The highest concentration of gaps is in 3GPP Security: Communications Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3GPP Security: Communications Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.