TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) with 45% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Architecture Overview.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authentication and Key Management(6 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
→EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy
6.4Secondary Authentication
→EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical Security
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions3 targets
→EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
→EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy
→EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical Security

Radio and Access Network Security(4 mappings)

6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
→EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy
6.9Handover Security2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
→EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy

Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security(2 mappings)

9.2Network Domain Security2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
→EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(8 mappings)

A.1Governance Framework
→EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers
A.2Risk Assessment2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification
→EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment
A.3Asset Management2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers
→EBA-GL-3.5.2ICT Asset Management
A.4Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers
→EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework
→EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)19 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)19 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)18 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)18 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)18 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)17 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Architecture Overview, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 10 map directly to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

12 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Architecture Overview with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Architecture Overview (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.