TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)vsUS NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants

See exactly how 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls map to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) maps to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants with 14% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security for Specific Services.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authentication and Key Management(6 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy3 targets
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions3 targets
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management

Service Based Architecture Security(2 mappings)

TS33.501-13.1NF Registration and Discovery Security
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
TS33.501-13.4OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) comparisons

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) vs OWASP SAMM8 mappings3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) vs Azure Security Benchmark8 mappings3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)8 mappings3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) vs NIST SP 800-1618 mappings3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) vs C5 (Germany)8 mappings3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation8 mappings3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) vs SLSA8 mappings3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) vs NIST SP 800-1468 mappings

Other US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) has 28 controls across its framework, while US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security for Specific Services, where 4 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls have no direct US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

Of 28 total 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls, 4 map directly to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

24 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls have no direct equivalent in US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security for Specific Services with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security for Specific Services (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.