Cross-Framework Mapping

21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
30
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls identifies 51 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Facilities (Subpart C)(1 mappings)

58.49Laboratory Operation Areas
8.5Control effectiveness review

Related Comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) has 31 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G), where 5 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 31 total 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls, 1 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 51 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

51 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 21 CFR Part 58 - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.