TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)vsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 10% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

General Provisions (Subpart A)(6 mappings)

58.1Scope3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
58.3Definitions3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security

Facilities (Subpart C)(1 mappings)

58.43Animal Care Facilities
→NSS17-1.1Computer Security Policy

Related Comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) comparisons

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts4 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 20214 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20243 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs FedRAMP Rev 53 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs ISO/IEC 27400:20223 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)3 mappings21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)3 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)11 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) has 31 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G), where 5 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 31 total 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls, 3 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

28 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Test Articles and Protocol (Subparts F & G) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.