TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing PracticevsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)

See exactly how 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls map to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
53
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice maps to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) with 7% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls identifies 53 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Subpart J — Records and Reports.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Subpart A — General Provisions(1 mappings)

CFR211-A-3Section 211.3 — Definitions
→SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition

Subpart G — Packaging and Labeling Control(3 mappings)

CFR211-G-122Section 211.122 — Materials Examination and Usage Criteria
→SEC-1.3Threat Categorization
CFR211-G-125Section 211.125 — Labeling Issuance
→SEC-1.3Threat Categorization
CFR211-G-130Section 211.130 — Packaging and Labeling Operations
→SEC-1.3Threat Categorization

Related Comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice comparisons

21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice vs FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)8 mappings21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice vs US OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework7 mappings21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)5 mappings21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice vs GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems5 mappings21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)5 mappings21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange5 mappings21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice vs Telecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR)5 mappings21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)5 mappings

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsISO 27017 vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice has 57 controls across its framework, while CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Subpart J — Records and Reports, where 9 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) equivalent.

How many controls map between 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

Of 57 total 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls, 4 map directly to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 53 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

53 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct equivalent in CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). The highest concentration of gaps is in Subpart J — Records and Reports with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Subpart J — Records and Reports (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.