NIST SP 800-37
RMF Step 6 - Monitor

NIST SP 800-37 NISTSP37-7: RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation

Execute the Monitor step per NIST SP 800-37 Rev 2 Chapter 3 Step 7. Maintain ongoing situational awareness of the security and privacy posture of the system to support risk management decisions. Tasks include (M-1) monitor system and environment changes (configuration drift + boundary changes + dependency changes + threat changes), (M-2) ongoing control assessments per the continuous monitoring strategy, (M-3) ongoing risk response (re-categorisation + re-selection + re-implementation + re-assessment as posture changes), (M-4) authorisation package updates with current state, (M-5) security and privacy reporting (dashboards + status reports + incident impact on authorisation), (M-6) ongoing authorisation (re-authorise based on continuous evidence rather than calendar). NIST SP 800-137 (Information Security Continuous Monitoring) provides the operational guidance for this step.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 98 controls across 51 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • 27557-1 Scope
  • 27557-3 Terms and definitions
  • 27557-6.4 Privacy risk treatment
  • 27557-6.6 Recording and reporting
  • 27557-7.3 Risk-based privacy program implementation
  • IS.AR.210 Findings and Corrective Actions
  • IS.D.OR.210 Information Security Risk Treatment
  • IS.I.OR.210 Information Security Risk Treatment
  • IS.I.OR.220 Information Security Risk Management
  • IEC62304-4.1 Quality Management System
  • IEC62304-5.1 Software Development Planning
  • IEC62304-7.4 Risk Management of Software Changes
  • IEC62304-9.6 Analyze Problems for Trends

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 · 4 controls

  • CPS230-16 Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
  • CPS230-37 Service Provider Management Policy
  • CPS230-46 Ongoing Risk Management of Each Material Arrangement
  • FFIEC-03 Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk
  • FFIEC-18 Ongoing monitoring and assessment
  • FFIEC-20 Exit strategy and transition planning
  • 60601-1.4.1 General requirements
  • 60601-1.4.2 Risk management process
  • 60601-1.5.1 General requirements for testing

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 · 3 controls

  • ISO23894-5.1 Leadership and Commitment
  • ISO23894-5.2 AI Risk Management Integration
  • ISO23894-5.5 Framework Evaluation
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03 Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04 Strategic direction that describes appropriate risk response options is established and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01 A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders

APRA CPS 234 · 2 controls

  • CPS234-16 Assessment of Related Party and Third Party Capability
  • CPS234-20 Information Asset Classification
  • AS9100D-10.2 Nonconformity and Corrective Action
  • AS9100D-8.1 Operational Planning and Control
  • ACQS-8-3 Continuous Improvement
  • ACQS-8-4 Risk Management
  • BS65000-RM-01 Resilience Journey
  • BS65000-RM-02 Integrated Approach
  • CAT-D1-2 Risk management
  • CAT-ML-2 Evolving
  • ICP-16 Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes
  • ICP-8 Risk Management and Internal Controls
  • ICAO-ANX17-Chap2-ThreatAssessment-RiskManagement-Cyber-GASeP ICAO Annex 17 Chapter 2 - Threat Assessment + Risk Management + Cyber Threats to Critical Aviation Systems (Amendment 17/18)
  • ICAO-ANX17-Chap4-Cargo-Mail-Catering-Stores-Supplies-RegulatedAgent-KnownConsignor ICAO Annex 17 Chapter 4 - Cargo + Mail + Catering + Stores + Supplies Security + Regulated Agent + Known Consignor + Supply Chain
  • ISO-15189-5.6 Risk management
  • ISO-15189-8.1 General requirements
  • ISO-20400-4.5 Key considerations for sustainable procurement
  • ISO-20400-6.5 Monitoring and continuous improvement
  • ISO-17025-8.1 Options
  • ISO-17025-8.7 Corrective actions
  • NFPA1600-7.2 After-Action Reporting
  • NFPA1600-8.2 Corrective Action
  • OCCHS-3 Risk Appetite Statement, Risk Limits, Concentration Risk, and Limit Breach Protocols
  • OCCHS-7 Risk Data Aggregation, Reporting, Talent, Compensation, and Strategic Planning

SWIFT CSCF · 2 controls

  • SWIFTCSCF-1 Restrict Internet Access and Protect Critical Systems (Objective 1)
  • SWIFTCSCF-3 Physically Secure the Environment (Objective 3)

South Korea ISMS-P · 2 controls

  • ISMSP-MS-02 Risk Management
  • ISMSP-MS-04 Management Review and Improvement
  • AMLCTF-82 Part A Compliance

API 1164 · 1 control

  • API1164-21 TSA Pipeline Security Directive Alignment
  • DIQ-2 Data Quality Management
  • CJIS-19 Supply Chain Risk Management

IEC 62443 · 1 control

  • IEC62443-21 Supply chain risk management for critical components
  • ISO-14064-1-8 Quality management of the GHG inventory

ISO 22320:2018 · 1 control

  • ISO-22320-4.3 Risk-based approach
  • ISO28001-SA-04 Security Risk Treatment Planning

ISO 30401 · 1 control

  • ISO30401-15 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • ISO-39001-10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • ISO-41001-10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action

ISO 56002 · 1 control

  • ISO-56002-10.2 Deviation, nonconformity and corrective action

ISO/IEC 27014:2020 · 1 control

  • 27014-5.6 Continuous improvement

ISO/IEC 27019:2024 · 1 control

  • ISO27019-21 Supply chain risk management for critical components
  • NISTPF-2 Govern-P - Governance Policies, Risk Management Strategy, Awareness Training, and Monitoring

NIST SP 1800-32 · 1 control

  • NZISM-1 NZISM Governance, Documentation, and Classification System
  • PSPF24-1 Security Culture, Governance, Risk Management
  • 2.5.2 Verification Activities
  • AIGF-1.1 Risk Management and Internal Controls
  • IM8-TPM.4 Supply Chain Risk Management
  • CRM-3 Risk Management Framework
  • VPSHR-3 Implementation Guidance and Reporting

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 98 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.