NIST SP 800-37
RMF Step 6 - Monitor

NIST SP 800-37 7: RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation

Execute the Monitor step per NIST SP 800-37 Rev 2 Chapter 3 Step 7. Maintain ongoing situational awareness of the security and privacy posture of the system to support risk management decisions. Tasks include (M-1) monitor system and environment changes (configuration drift + boundary changes + dependency changes + threat changes), (M-2) ongoing control assessments per the continuous monitoring strategy, (M-3) ongoing risk response (re-categorisation + re-selection + re-implementation + re-assessment as posture changes), (M-4) authorisation package updates with current state, (M-5) security and privacy reporting (dashboards + status reports + incident impact on authorisation), (M-6) ongoing authorisation (re-authorise based on continuous evidence rather than calendar). NIST SP 800-137 (Information Security Continuous Monitoring) provides the operational guidance for this step.

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 123 controls across 65 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27005 · 4 controls

ISO 31000 · 4 controls

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 · 4 controls

  • CPS230-16 Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
  • CPS230-37 Service Provider Management Policy
  • CPS230-46 Ongoing Risk Management of Each Material Arrangement
  • FFIEC-03 Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk
  • FFIEC-18 Ongoing monitoring and assessment
  • FFIEC-20 Exit strategy and transition planning

ISO 9001 · 3 controls

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 · 3 controls

  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03 Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04 Strategic direction that describes appropriate risk response options is established and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01 A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
  • 3.1 Physical Security
  • 3.16 System and Services Acquisition
  • 3.17 Supply Chain Risk Management

APRA CPS 234 · 2 controls

  • CPS234-16 Assessment of Related Party and Third Party Capability
  • CPS234-20 Information Asset Classification
  • 1.1 SWIFT Environment Protection
  • 3.1 Physical Security
  • ICP-16 Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes
  • ICP-8 Risk Management and Internal Controls
  • OCCHS-3 Risk Appetite Statement, Risk Limits, Concentration Risk, and Limit Breach Protocols
  • OCCHS-7 Risk Data Aggregation, Reporting, Talent, Compensation, and Strategic Planning

SWIFT CSCF · 2 controls

  • SWIFTCSCF-1 Restrict Internet Access and Protect Critical Systems (Objective 1)
  • SWIFTCSCF-3 Physically Secure the Environment (Objective 3)

South Korea ISMS-P · 2 controls

API 1164 · 1 control

  • API1164-21 TSA Pipeline Security Directive Alignment
  • CJIS-19 Supply Chain Risk Management

IEC 62443 · 1 control

  • IEC62443-21 Supply chain risk management for critical components

ISO 19011 · 1 control

ISO 22000 · 1 control

ISO 22320:2018 · 1 control

ISO 27019 · 1 control

  • ISO27019-21 Supply chain risk management for critical components

ISO 30401 · 1 control

ISO 37001 · 1 control

ISO 37301 · 1 control

ISO 45001 · 1 control

ISO 55001 · 1 control

ISO 56002 · 1 control

ISO/IEC 27014:2020 · 1 control

  • NISTPF-2 Govern-P - Governance Policies, Risk Management Strategy, Awareness Training, and Monitoring

NIST SP 1800-32 · 1 control

  • NZISM-1 NZISM Governance, Documentation, and Classification System
  • PSPF24-1 Security Culture, Governance, Risk Management
  • 2.5.2 Verification Activities
  • AIGF-1.1 Risk Management and Internal Controls
  • VPSHR-3 Implementation Guidance and Reporting

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 123 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.