Three linked disciplines sit in one point because they fail together. Human resources security covers screening proportionate to the role, security terms in employment, and the leaver process. Access control policy covers how identities are created, what rights they carry, how privileged access is granted and reviewed, and how rights change when a person moves internally. Asset management covers knowing what the entity has, who owns it, how it is classified and what happens at disposal. The join between them is where evidence is usually thin: a leaver process that reclaims the laptop but not the cloud account, or an access review run against a directory that does not include the systems that matter. Internal movers are a sharper test than leavers, because accumulated rights are rarely removed.
NIS2 Directive Art.21.2.i is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIS2 Directive your existing evidence covers. Hold DORA and 17 of 28 NIS2 Directive controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the DORA pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.