UPS configuration should follow a risk analysis: N+1 or N+N, with each redundant unit able to carry the full load; dual UPS and Medical IT (N+N) should be considered for Group 2 locations; the designer should demonstrate the chosen solution is optimum. UPS to BS EN 62040-1. Central UPS increases common failure exposure and needs segregated routes. Diagnostic equipment inrush can push a UPS to bypass, so manufacturers' operating characteristics should be obtained; UPS output protection should discriminate with upstream devices and the inverter or static switch. UPS should give multiple alarm outputs for remote monitoring. Facilities should let the Authorised Person quickly and safely bypass a UPS after catastrophic failure, and where appropriate a UPS should be removable and replaceable with no impact on service.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.