FSSC 22000 v6 Additional Requirements - FSSC-specific scheme additions beyond ISO 22000 + ISO/TS 22002-x (publicly available + downloadable from fssc.com). KEY REQUIREMENTS: (1) FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY CULTURE - documented program with leadership behaviour + training + recognition + competence + retention + 4-pillar approach (Vision + Values + Behaviour + Performance) + measured via culture surveys + KPIs; (2) FOOD DEFENSE (TACCP - Threat Assessment Critical Control Points) - threat identification + threat assessment + critical control points + mitigation + monitoring + verification + against intentional + ideologically + economically motivated tampering + insider threats + cyber-attack on food safety systems; (3) FOOD FRAUD MITIGATION (VACCP - Vulnerability Assessment Critical Control Points) - vulnerability assessment per material + supplier + economic incentive + opportunity + adulteration history + mitigation + verification + supplier-management integration; (4) ALLERGEN MANAGEMENT - identification + risk assessment + segregation + cleaning validation + labelling + employee training + incident management + Codex + FDA + EU 1169/2011 alignment; (5) ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING - microbiological monitoring of production environments + Listeria + Salmonella + Cronobacter + other pathogens + zoning + sampling plan + trending + corrective action; (6) PRODUCT LABELLING + CLAIMS - compliance with applicable regulations + nutritional + allergen + country-of-origin + organic + halal + kosher + others; (7) STORAGE + TRANSPORT - sanitary conditions + temperature + segregation + cross-contamination prevention; (8) FSSC LOGO USE; (9) HAZARD CONTROL + CROSS-CONTAMINATION; (10) MANAGEMENT OF SERVICES + PURCHASED MATERIALS supplier qualification; (11) PERSONAL HYGIENE + TRAINING; (12) v6 NEW: QUALITY CULTURE + LOSS REDUCTION + (anticipated v6.1) cybersecurity + AI use.
This control maps to 87 controls across 49 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 87 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.