FedRAMP Moderate
SA - System and Services Acquisition

FedRAMP Moderate SA-11: Developer Testing and Evaluation

Require developer to test at FedRAMP-defined depth and coverage; document; correct flaws.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 38 controls across 19 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CIS Controls v8 · 6 controls

  • CIS-16.1 Establish and Maintain a Secure Application Development Process
  • CIS-16.12 Implement Code-Level Security Checks
  • CIS-16.13 Conduct Application Penetration Testing
  • CIS-16.2 Establish and Maintain a Process to Accept and Address Software Vulnerabilities
  • CIS-16.8 Separate Production and Non-Production Systems
  • CIS-18.3 Remediate Penetration Test Findings

NIST SP 800-218 · 6 controls

Azure Security Benchmark · 3 controls

  • ASBv3-DS-4 Integrate static application security testing into DevOps pipeline
  • ASBv3-DS-5 Integrate dynamic application security testing into DevOps pipeline
  • DS-6 Enforce security of workload throughout DevOps lifecycle

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

  • 6.2.3 Custom software reviewed prior to production
  • 6.2.3.1 Code review findings corrected
  • 6.3.1 Security vulnerabilities are identified and managed as follows: • New security vulnerabilities are identified using industry-recognized sources for security vulnerability information, including alerts from international and national computer emergency response teams (CERTs). • Vulnerabilities

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

  • SEC11-BP02 Automate testing throughout the development and release lifecycle
  • SEC11-BP04 Conduct code reviews

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 8.26 Application security requirements
  • 8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 8.25 Secure development life cycle
  • 8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

  • AUCDR-IS-4 Formal vulnerability management program

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

  • CFTC-SS-5 Systems Development and Quality Assurance Category

DORA · 1 control

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • 6.11.2 Security in development and support processes

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

  • A.6.2.4 AI system verification and validation

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

  • NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06 Secure software development practices are integrated, and their performance is monitored throughout the software development life cycle

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 · 1 control

  • 53A-2.1 Assessments Within the System Development Life Cycle

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC8.1 Change management processes are in place

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in SA - System and Services Acquisition

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate SA-11 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gapsIf you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gapsIf you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gapsIf you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gapsIf you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gapsIf you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 eachBrowse the graph free

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 38 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpointAll FedRAMP Moderate controls