FedRAMP Moderate SA-11(1): Developer Testing and Evaluation | Static Code Analysis (SA-11(1))

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 25 controls across 13 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 6 controls

6.2.1 6.2.1 Secure development of bespoke and custom software
6.2.3 6.2.3 Code review before release
6.2.3.1 6.2.3.1 Manual code review independence and approval
6.2.4 6.2.4 Engineering techniques against common software attacks
6.3.1 6.3.1 Vulnerability identification and risk ranking
6.5.1 6.5.1 Change control procedure for production

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

8.25 Secure development life cycle
8.28 Secure coding
8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

NIST SP 800-218 · 3 controls

SP800-218-PW.7.1 Code Review
SP800-218-PW.7.2 Perform Code Review and Analysis
SP800-218-RV.1.2 Review and Analyze Code for Vulnerabilities

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC11-BP02 Automate testing throughout the development and release lifecycle
SEC11-BP04 Conduct code reviews

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-DEV-06 Testing changes
C5-PSS-02 Identification of Vulnerabilities of the Cloud Service

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

8.28 Secure coding
8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

AUCDR-IS-4 Formal vulnerability management program

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-DS-4 Integrate static application security testing into DevOps pipeline

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

CIS-16.12 Implement Code-Level Security Checks

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-AIS-05 Automated Application Security Testing

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06 Secure software development practices are integrated, and their performance is monitored throughout the software development life cycle

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.14.7e Verify Correctness of Security Functions

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-SA-11 SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate SA-11(1) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free