FedRAMP Moderate SA-15: Development Process, Standards, and Tools (SA-15)

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 41 controls across 18 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-218 · 9 controls

SP800-218-PO.1.1 Define Security Requirements for Software Development
SP800-218-PO.1.2 Implement Security Requirements in the Toolchain
SP800-218-PO.3.1 Supporting Toolchain Selection
SP800-218-PO.3.2 Toolchain Configuration and Integration
SP800-218-PW.4.2 Maintain Well-Secured In-House Components
SP800-218-PW.5.1 Secure Coding Practices
SP800-218-PW.6.1 Configure Compilation and Build Processes Securely
SP800-218-PW.6.2 Configure Build Tool Security Features
SP800-218-RV.3.3 Review SDLC to Prevent Recurrence

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

8.25 Secure development life cycle
8.26 Application security requirements
8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles
8.28 Secure coding

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

5.8 Information security in project management
8.25 Secure development life cycle
8.28 Secure coding
8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

NIST800-SA-15 SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools
NIST800-SA-17 SA-17 Developer Security and Privacy Architecture and Design
NIST800-SA-22 SA-22 Unsupported System Components
SP800-53-SA System and Services Acquisition Family

PCI DSS 4.0 · 4 controls

6.2.1 6.2.1 Secure development of bespoke and custom software
6.2.4 6.2.4 Engineering techniques against common software attacks
6.3.1 6.3.1 Vulnerability identification and risk ranking
6.5.3 6.5.3 Separate pre-production from production

Azure Security Benchmark · 3 controls

ASBv3-DS-3 Secure DevOps infrastructure
ASBv3-GS-10 Define and implement DevOps security strategy
DS-6 Enforce security of workload throughout DevOps lifecycle

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-AIS-01 Application and Interface Security Policy and Procedures
CCM-AIS-04 Secure Application Design and Development

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC11-BP06 Deploy software programmatically

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

AUCDR-IS-4 Formal vulnerability management program

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-DEV-04 Safety training and awareness programme regarding continuous software delivery and associated systems, components or tools

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-5 Systems Development and Quality Assurance Category

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

CIS-16.1 Establish and Maintain a Secure Application Development Process

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

6.11.2 Security in development and support processes

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

A.6.1.3 Processes for responsible design and development of AI systems

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06 Secure software development practices are integrated, and their performance is monitored throughout the software development life cycle

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 HIGH · 1 control

SA-15 SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE · 1 control

SA-15 SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate SA-15 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free