Where bespoke and custom software is reviewed manually before it goes to production, each code change must be: examined by someone other than the person who wrote it, who is knowledgeable about secure coding practice and techniques for reviewing code; and reviewed and approved by management before release. It applies to all entities that perform manual code reviews. Applicability: manual reviews may be carried out by knowledgeable internal staff or knowledgeable third parties; a person formally given accountability for release control, who is neither the author nor the reviewer, counts as management for this purpose. Objective under the customized approach: the manual review process cannot be skipped and reliably uncovers security vulnerabilities.
This control maps to 36 controls across 19 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06 Secure software development practices are integrated, and their performance is monitored throughout the software development life cycle
You are reading one control. How much of PCI DSS 4.0 have you already done?
PCI DSS 4.0 6.2.3.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.