C5 (Germany) C5-PSS-02: Identification of Vulnerabilities of the Cloud Service

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 39 controls across 18 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-218 · 7 controls

SP800-218-PS.3.2 Software Bill of Materials
SP800-218-PW.4.1 Reuse Trusted Software Components
SP800-218-PW.4.4 Verify Acquired Components Meet Security Requirements
SP800-218-PW.7.1 Code Review
SP800-218-PW.7.2 Perform Code Review and Analysis
SP800-218-PW.8.1 Executable Testing for Security
SP800-218-RV.1.2 Review and Analyze Code for Vulnerabilities

FedRAMP High · 5 controls

RA-5 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
RA-5(11) Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning | Public Disclosure Program (RA-5(11))
SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation
SA-11(1) Developer Testing and Evaluation | Static Code Analysis (SA-11(1))
SA-11(2) Developer Testing and Evaluation | Threat Modeling and Vulnerability Analyses (SA-11(2))

FedRAMP Moderate · 5 controls

RA-5 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
RA-5(11) Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning | Public Disclosure Program (RA-5(11))
SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation
SA-11(1) Developer Testing and Evaluation | Static Code Analysis (SA-11(1))
SA-11(2) Developer Testing and Evaluation | Threat Modeling and Vulnerability Analyses (SA-11(2))

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

CIS-16.1 Establish and Maintain a Secure Application Development Process
CIS-16.2 Establish and Maintain a Process to Accept and Address Software Vulnerabilities
CIS-7.6 Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Externally-Exposed Enterprise Assets

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC11-BP02 Automate testing throughout the development and release lifecycle
SEC11-BP04 Conduct code reviews

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-DS-4 Integrate static application security testing into DevOps pipeline
DS-2 Ensure software supply chain security

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-AIS-05 Automated Application Security Testing
CCM-AIS-07 Application Vulnerability Remediation

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

6.2.3 6.2.3 Code review before release
6.3.1 6.3.1 Vulnerability identification and risk ranking

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

AUCDR-IS-4 Formal vulnerability management program

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

RA.L2-3.11.2 Vulnerability Scan

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

Art.21.2.e Security in acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling and disclosure

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01 Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-RA-5 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.11.02 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-SA-11 SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of C5 (Germany) have you already done?

C5 (Germany) C5-PSS-02 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.

If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.178.5% covered · 26 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 572.7% covered · 33 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate71.1% covered · 35 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202267.8% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202257% covered · 52 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 350.4% covered · 60 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free