FedRAMP Moderate
SA - System and Services Acquisition

FedRAMP Moderate SA-11(2): Developer Testing and Evaluation | Threat Modeling and Vulnerability Analyses. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to perform threat modeling and vulnerability analyses during development and the subsequent testing

Developer Testing and Evaluation | Threat Modeling and Vulnerability Analyses. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to perform threat modeling and vulnerability analyses during development and the subsequent testing

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 23 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-CC3.2 COSO principle 7: Identifies risks and analyzes to determine how managed
  • SOC2-CC5.1 COSO principle 10: Selects and develops control activities to mitigate risks
  • SOC2-CC8.1 Change management processes are in place
  • SOC2-CC9.1 Identifies, selects and develops risk mitigation activities

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

  • 8.25 Secure development life cycle
  • 8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles
  • 8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

  • NIST800-SA-11 Developer testing and evaluation
  • NIST800-SA-17 Developer Security and Privacy Architecture and Design. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to produce a design specification and security and privacy architecture that: Is consistent with the organization's
  • NIST800-SA-22 Unsupported System Components

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

  • 6.2.1 Bespoke and custom software are developed securely, as follows: • Based on industry standards and/or best practices for secure development. • In accordance with PCI DSS (for example, secure authentication and logging). • Incorporating
  • 6.2.4 Coding practices prevent common attacks
  • 6.3.1 Security vulnerabilities are identified and managed as follows: • New security vulnerabilities are identified using industry-recognized sources for security vulnerability information, including alerts from international and national computer emergency response teams (CERTs). • Vulnerabilities

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 8.25 Secure development life cycle
  • 8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

NIST SP 800-218 · 2 controls

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

  • SEC01-BP07 Identify threats and prioritize mitigations using a threat model

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-PSS-02 Identification of Vulnerabilities of the Cloud Service

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

  • 3.11.1e Threat-Aware Risk Assessment

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in SA - System and Services Acquisition

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate SA-11(2) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gapsIf you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gapsIf you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gapsIf you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gapsIf you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gapsIf you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 eachBrowse the graph free

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 23 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpointAll FedRAMP Moderate controls