FedRAMP Moderate SA-11(2): Developer Testing and Evaluation | Threat Modeling and Vulnerability Analyses (SA-11(2))

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 23 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 4 controls

SOC2-CC3.2 CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
SOC2-CC5.1 CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
SOC2-CC8.1 CC8.1 Managing changes to procedures, software, data and infrastructure
SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

8.25 Secure development life cycle
8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles
8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

NIST800-SA-11 SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation
NIST800-SA-17 SA-17 Developer Security and Privacy Architecture and Design
NIST800-SA-22 SA-22 Unsupported System Components

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

6.2.1 6.2.1 Secure development of bespoke and custom software
6.2.4 6.2.4 Engineering techniques against common software attacks
6.3.1 6.3.1 Vulnerability identification and risk ranking

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

8.25 Secure development life cycle
8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

NIST SP 800-218 · 2 controls

SP800-218-PW.1.1 Design Software to Meet Security Requirements
SP800-218-RV.1.2 Review and Analyze Code for Vulnerabilities

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC01-BP07 Identify threats and prioritize mitigations using a threat model

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-DS-1 Conduct threat modeling

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-PSS-02 Identification of Vulnerabilities of the Cloud Service

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-AIS-05 Automated Application Security Testing

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.11.1e Threat-Aware Risk Assessment

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate SA-11(2) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free