NIST SP 800-218 SP800-218-PW.8.1: Executable Testing for Security

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 44 controls across 22 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

C5 (Germany) · 3 controls

C5-DEV-06 Testing changes
C5-OPS-19 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Penetration Tests
C5-PSS-02 Identification of Vulnerabilities of the Cloud Service

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

CIS-16.12 Implement Code-Level Security Checks
CIS-16.13 Conduct Application Penetration Testing
CIS-18.1 Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

CA-8 Penetration Testing
RA-5 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

CA-8 Penetration Testing
RA-5 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

NIST800-CA-8 CA-8 Penetration Testing
NIST800-RA-5 RA-5 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
NIST800-SA-11 SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation

OpenSSF Best Practices Badge Criteria · 3 controls

passing.dynamic_analysis dynamic_analysis (Passing, SUGGESTED)
passing.dynamic_analysis_unsafe dynamic_analysis_unsafe (Passing, SUGGESTED)
silver.dynamic_analysis_unsafe dynamic_analysis_unsafe (Silver, MUST)

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC11-BP02 Automate testing throughout the development and release lifecycle
SEC11-BP03 Perform regular penetration testing

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-DS-5 Integrate dynamic application security testing into DevOps pipeline
ASBv3-PV-7 Conduct regular red team operations

BSIMM · 2 controls

PT1.3 Use penetration testing tools internally
ST1.1 Perform edge/boundary value condition testing

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-AIS-05 Automated Application Security Testing
CCM-TVM-06 Penetration Testing

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01 Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06 Secure software development practices are integrated, and their performance is monitored throughout the software development life cycle

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

161R1-RA-5 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
161R1-SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.04.04 Impact Analyses
03.11.02 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning

NIST SP 800-172 · 2 controls

3.12.1e Penetration Testing by Independent Agents
3.14.7e Verify Correctness of Security Functions

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

11.3.1.3 11.3.1.3 Internal scans after significant change
6.4.1 6.4.1 Public web application review or automated protection

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
SOC2-CC8.1 CC8.1 Managing changes to procedures, software, data and infrastructure

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

RA.L2-3.11.2 Vulnerability Scan

EU Cyber Resilience Act · 1 control

Annex I Part II(3) Effective and regular security testing and review

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

A.6.2.4 AI system verification and validation

OpenSSF Scorecard · 1 control

Fuzzing Fuzzing check

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of NIST SP 800-218 have you already done?

NIST SP 800-218 SP800-218-PW.8.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST SP 800-218 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 30 of 42 NIST SP 800-218 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 571.4% covered · 12 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)61.9% covered · 16 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-161 Rev 161.9% covered · 16 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.152.4% covered · 20 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202252.4% covered · 20 gaps If you hold Azure Security Benchmark50% covered · 21 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free