CNIL Guidance on Employee Monitoring and Workplace Video Surveillance
General conditions for any activity-control device – CNIL Guidance on Employee Monitoring and Workplace Video Surveillance

CNIL Guidance on Employee Monitoring and Workplace Video Surveillance ACT-2: ACT-2 Show the device is necessary: no less intrusive means, only the data, retention and access strictly required

The device must be necessary to the objective: the employer checks that no less intrusive means would achieve it and determines which data are strictly needed, how long they must be kept and which persons may access them because of their duties. Measuring productivity over longer periods rather than continuously is given as an example of a proportionate design (a transparent count of files handled per quarter).

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

GDPR · 2 controls

  • GDPR-Art.25 Data protection by design and by default
  • GDPR-Art.5 Principles relating to processing of personal data

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in General conditions for any activity-control device – CNIL Guidance on Employee Monitoring and Workplace Video Surveillance

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpointAll CNIL Guidance on Employee Monitoring and Workplace Video Surveillance controls